How to Enrich a LinkedIn Profile With Full Structured Data (API & MCP or n8n)

// WHEN TO USE

Problem

// WHAT YOU GET

Outcome

// RESULTS

Proof

// BUILDING BLOCKS

Periodix Actions used

• Get Profile

  Retrieve the full LinkedIn profile of a person by public identifier or internal ID. Returns name, headline, summary, location, complete work experience, education, skills, languages, and certifications. It works on any LinkedIn profile, including leads you found through a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator search. The core enrichment action that turns a search result into rich data for CRM push or ICP scoring.

// HOW IT WORKS

Flow

// RUN IT

Implementations

// OUTPUT SHAPE

Example JSON output

{
  "provider_id": "abc123",
  "first_name": "Jane",
  "last_name": "Doe",
  "headline": "VP of Sales at Acme Corp",
  "summary": "15 years driving B2B revenue...",
  "location": "San Francisco, CA",
  "industry": "Software",
  "experience": [
    {
      "title": "VP of Sales",
      "company": "Acme Corp",
      "start_date": "2022-03",
      "end_date": null,
      "description": "Leading a team of 20 AEs..."
    }
  ],
  "education": [
    {
      "school": "Stanford University",
      "degree": "MBA",
      "field": "Business Administration"
    }
  ],
  "skills": [
    "B2B Sales",
    "SaaS",
    "Revenue Operations"
  ],
  "certifications": [],
  "languages": [
    "English",
    "Spanish"
  ]
}

// CONNECTS WITH

Integrations used

HubSpotNotionOpenAIClaude (Anthropic)Google Sheets

// FITS INTO

Use cases

// QUESTIONS

FAQ

What data does get-profile return?

Full structured profile: name, headline, summary, location, industry, work experience with dates and descriptions, education, skills, certifications, and languages.

Can I enrich profiles in bulk?

Yes. Pass provider_ids from a linkedin-search or search-people result through a loop or batch node. Periodix Actions handles rate limiting automatically.

How much more cost-efficient is get-profile than an Apify-based setup?

get-profile can be up to 9Х more cost-efficient for LinkedIn profile enrichment. With Apify, the total cost can include the platform subscription, Actor usage, pay-per-result or pay-per-event charges, compute, proxies and other resources. Some Actors can also have separate fees in addition to platform usage

How much more cost-efficient is get-profile than a Clay-based LinkedIn enrichment workflow?

For high-volume profile enrichment, get-profile can be at least 20Х more cost-efficient than a comparable Clay workflow, depending on the enrichment workflow and volume. Clay combines platform Actions with Data Credits, with costs varying by data type, provider, and workflow.

Does this work with Sales Navigator URLs?

Yes. Both Classic LinkedIn profile URLs and Sales Navigator lead URLs are accepted.

// EXPLORE MORE

Related playbooks

• Score Linkedin or Sales Navigator leads by ICP and draft outreach

  LinkedIn or Sales Navigator search returns hundreds of profiles, and most of them are not a fit. Teams handle this in two expensive ways. Some message everyone, which burns limited sending capacity, hurts reply rate, and trains them to blast more. Others pay to enrich and AI-score every single row in a tool like Clay, spending credits on leads that were never going to qualify. Either way you pay full price for the whole list before you know who is worth it.